2024 年第4 期(总第16期)145
nonproliferation commitment. The contemporary policy implication is that Taiwan’s high-tech industries arelikely to display stronger opposition to United States–demanded controls over trade in semiconductor goodswith China.
6. 主权脚本与区域治理:东盟对新冠疫情的反应(Sovereignty scripts andregional
governance: ASEAN’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic)Kilian Spandler,斯德哥尔摩大学国际关系系副教授
Julia Hartelius,皇家墨尔本理工大学全球研究学院客座研究员
Alva Montia,斯德哥尔摩大学
Fredrik Söderbaum,斯德哥尔摩大学
【摘要】本文以东南亚国家联盟(东盟)为重点,试图加深对主权在地区治理中的作用的理解。作者认为,通过分析东盟如何应对新冠疫情,可以对这一问题提供重要见解。关于东盟的大多数研究都认为主权是有效区域治理的障碍,而没有从概念上对其进行进一步的探讨。这种单一的理解无法解释东盟对这新冠疫情的不同反应。为了更全面地阐述主权与地区治理之间的关系,本文参考了有关主权的学术研究,强调主权的展演性和情景性,并建立了一个区分四种不同主权文本的框架。通过专家访谈和文件分析,我们发现东盟对新冠疫情的多层面回应是成员国并行制定不同且相互重叠的主权模式的结果,这些主权模式产生了相互竞争的治理模式。研究表明,典型的治理问题——机构激增、不一致以及执行差距——可以被理解为源于实践主权和国家地位的不同要求。本文建议在东盟以外的其他政策领域和地区组织中检验该框架。
【原文】This article seeks to advance our understanding of the role of sovereignty for regional governance,
with a focus on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). We argue that important insights intothis issue can be gleaned by analyzing how ASEAN has responded to the Covid-19 pandemic. Most existingresearch on ASEAN considers sovereignty an obstacle to effective regional governance without further
interrogating it conceptually. Such a monolithic understanding fails to account for ASEAN’s variegatedresponse to the pandemic. To develop a fuller account of the relation between sovereignty and regional
governance, we engage with scholarship on sovereignty that emphasizes its performative and contextual
character, and develop a framework that distinguishes four different sovereignty scripts. Drawing onexpert
interviews and document analysis, we show that ASEAN’s multifaceted Covid-19 response is a result of
member states’ parallel enactment of diverging and overlapping sovereignty scripts, which engender
competing modes of governance. Our study shows that typical governance problems – institutional
proliferation and incoherence as well as implementation gaps – can be understood as emergingfromdiverging imperatives for practicing sovereignty and statehood. We suggest that our framework can be testedin other policy fields and regional organizations beyond ASEAN.
【编译:张潇文】【责任编辑:严瑾怡】